Abstract
THE objection to Duchayla's proof of the “parallelogram of forces” is, I suppose, admitted by all mathematicians. To base the fundamental principle of the equilibrium of a particle on the “transmissibility of force,” and thus to introduce the conception of a rigid body, is certainly the reverse of logical procedure. The substitute for this proof which finds most favour with modern writers is, of course, that depending on the “parallelogram of accelerations.” But this is open to almost as serious objections as the other. For it introduces kinetic ideas which are really nowhere again used in statics. I should therefore propose the following proof, which depends on very elementary geometrical propositions. The general order of argument resembles that of Laplace.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
