Abstract

Organisms are exposed to temperatures that vary, for example on diurnal and seasonal time scales. Thus, the ability to behaviorally and/or physiologically respond to variation in temperatures is a fundamental requirement for long-term persistence. Studies on thermal biology in ectotherms are typically performed under constant laboratory conditions, which differ markedly from the variation in temperature across time and space in nature. Here, we investigate evolutionary adaptation and environmentally induced plastic responses of Drosophila simulans to no fluctuations (constant), predictable fluctuations or unpredictable fluctuations in temperature. We whole-genome sequenced populations exposed to 20 generations of experimental evolution under the three thermal regimes and examined the proteome after short-term exposure to the same three regimes. We find that unpredictable fluctuations cause the strongest response at both genome and proteome levels. The loci showing evolutionary responses were generally unique to each thermal regime, but a minor overlap suggests either common laboratory adaptation or that some loci were involved in the adaptation to multiple thermal regimes. The evolutionary response, i.e., loci under selection, did not coincide with induced responses of the proteome. Thus, genes under selection in fluctuating thermal environments are distinct from genes important for the adaptive plastic response observed within a generation. This information is key to obtain a better understanding and prediction of the effects of future increases in both mean and variability of temperatures.

Highlights

  • It is well known that different adaptive responses for coping with stressful temperature conditions exist

  • The unpredictable fluctuations likely expose the flies to a stronger selection pressure than the constant and predictably fluctuating temperatures, which both showed a lower number of consistently differentiated SNPs (Table 1)

  • We found a signal of the 20 generations of experimental evolution as flies maintained in constant, predictable or unpredictable fluctuating environments showed independent genomic differentiation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is well known that different adaptive responses for coping with stressful temperature conditions exist. Organisms can respond plastically to environmental changes (Pigliucci, 1996, 2001; Lande, 2009), while evolutionary responses may occur through both changes in trait means and in the level of plasticity (Hoffmann and Parsons, 1989; Williams et al, 2008; Lande, 2009; Kristensen et al, 2018) It is debated whether plasticity or evolutionary responses constitute the main contributor to temperature adaptation in small ectothermic animals (Gunderson and Stillman, 2015; Sgrò et al, 2016; Sørensen et al, 2016a). It is not clear how and how much small ectothermic animals can and will respond to a warming climate

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call