Abstract

BackgroundSmoking is a major risk factor for dyslipidemia. However, it remains to be clarified whether light smoking in Asian women affects lipid profiles and lipid-related indices. The aim of this study was to determine the relationships between lipid-related indices and smoking in Japanese women. Alcohol drinking influences blood lipid levels and is a potent confounder for the relationship between smoking and blood lipids. Thus, analysis for the relationships between smoking and blood lipid-related indices was also performed after stratification of drinking status.MethodsThe participants were 18,793 Japanese women aged 35–70 years. A cross-sectional study was performed using a local population-based database. The relationships of smoking with each index were investigated by using analysis of covariance and logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age and other lifestyle factors such as alcohol drinking and regular exercise.ResultsIn multivariate logistic regression analysis, odds ratios of smokers vs. nonsmokers for high ratio of LDL cholesterol to HDL cholesterol (LDL-C/HDL-C), high ratio of triglycerides to HDL cholesterol (TG/HDL-C), high lipid accumulation product (LAP) and high cardio metabolic index (CMI) were significantly higher than the reference level of 1.00 in overall participants (2.17 [1.78–2.66], 1.70 [1.47–1.97], 1.17 [1.08–1.27] and 1.41 [1.30–1.53], respectively), nondrinking participants (2.29 [1.80–2.91], 1.68 [1.39–2.02], 1.21 [1.08–1.36] and 1.46 [1.30–1.63], respectively), and drinking participants (1.96 [1.35–2.85], 1.76 [1.39–2.21], 1.13 [1.01–1.27] and 1.38 [1.22–1.55], respectively). In overall participants, nondrinking participants, and drinking participants, LDL-C/HDL-C, TG/HDL-C, LAP and CMI were significantly higher in smokers than in nonsmokers. In nondrinking participants, triglycerides and LDL cholesterol were significantly higher in smokers than in nonsmokers, while the ratio of waist circumference to height and HDL cholesterol were significantly lower in smokers than in nonsmokers.ConclusionIn women, all of the four lipid-related indices tested were higher in smokers than in nonsmokers, and these associations were independent of alcohol drinking. The high levels of the lipid-related indices in smokers result from the detrimental effects of smoking on levels of blood lipids such as triglycerides, HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol.

Highlights

  • Smoking is a major risk factor for dyslipidemia

  • In a recent study in which database of Chinese male subjects was analyzed, smoking was associated with triglyceride level (TG)/The ratio of triglycerides to HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and lipid accumulation product (LAP) independently of alcohol drinking [29]

  • The above odds ratio in light smokers vs. nonsmokers for high cardio metabolic index (CMI) in women was 1.21-fold higher than the odds ratio in men, and this ratio is close to the female-to-male relative risk ratio of smoking for coronary heart disease of 1.25 shown by the above meta-analysis study [19]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Smoking is a major risk factor for dyslipidemia. it remains to be clarified whether light smoking in Asian women affects lipid profiles and lipid-related indices. The results of a previous meta-analysis showed that HDL cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly lower (− 5.7%) and higher (9.1%), respectively, in smokers than in nonsmokers, while LDL cholesterol was not significantly different between nonsmokers and smokers (1.7%) [14]. These differences in blood lipid levels in smokers and nonsmokers are thought to reflect smoking-induced changes in lipid metabolism: smokers have been reported to have lower activities of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) and a higher activity of cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) than those in nonsmokers [15, 16]. A randomized clinical trial showed that one-year smoking cessation resulted in a significant increase in HDL cholesterol but no change in LDL cholesterol [17]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call