Abstract
As responses to first-time, nonviolent juvenile offenders move towards community-based restorative justice, approaches such as the Balanced and Restorative Justice (BARJ) Model are prominent. The BARJ Model engages the youth offender, offense victim(s), and community in which the offense occurred with three associated goals: accountability, community safety, and competency development. However, while the goals of accountability and community safety are often prioritized, many community-based restorative justice programs neglect the goal of competency development, which is ultimately a disservice not only to the youth offender, but to the community. To interrupt the cyclical nature of juvenile offending and support the long-term rehabilitation of the youth offender, the integration of the BARJ model and a positive youth development (PYD) approach within the context of community-based restorative justice is proposed. PYD is grounded in the belief that all youth have the potential for healthy development, viewing them as assets and resources in community settings. To enhance long-term development, PYD objectives simultaneously promote protective factors, develop internal and external assets, and mitigate risk factors. The integration of a PYD approach within the BARJ model addresses the need to enhance youth competency development through PYD indicators inherent to many community-based programs. This article explores the conceptual compatibility of integration of the BARJ model and a PYD approach with the goal of promoting competency development among youth offenders in a restorative justice context.
Highlights
This poses a systemic challenge, as competency development is arguably the most critical for the long-term rehabilitation of the youth offender, equipping youth with skills that will empower them to be responsible, productive citizens (Pavelka, 2016). To address this lack of specific competency development and to enhance the implementation of the Balanced and Restorative Justice Model (BARJ) model, the authors propose the use of a positive youth development (PYD) approach
As society moves away from punitive sanctions and towards a socially just, rehabilitative model when working with first-time, nonviolent youth offenders, approaches such as the BARJ model are becoming more frequently utilized
With the goal of promoting competency development, this article explored the conceptual compatibility of integration of the BARJ model and a PYD approach to program delivery
Summary
Many communities are moving away from punitive sanctions towards a rehabilitative model of juvenile justice (Goshe, 2014), for first-time, nonviolent offenders. Facilitators of the BARJ model, may fail to treat these goals commonly assuming that competency development is accomplished through accountability and community safety goals (Pranis et al, 1998), or failing to attribute equal weight on the basis of the ill-defined purpose, objectives, activities, and outcomes of competency development (Torbet & Thomas, 2005) This poses a systemic challenge, as competency development is arguably the most critical for the long-term rehabilitation of the youth offender, equipping youth with skills that will empower them to be responsible, productive citizens (Pavelka, 2016). This manuscript explores the conceptual compatibility of integrating the BARJ model and a PYD approach with the goal of promoting competency development among youth offenders
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
