Abstract

This quasi-experimental study used a pre-/posttest design to investigate student’s scientific habits of mind (SHOM) and chemical literacy. There were 32 students of the 11th grade selected for the experimental and control class. They were taken by random sampling. The experimental class applied inquiry learning via Predict-Observe-Explain-Extend (POEEd) using the socio-scientific issue (SSI) context, while the control class used a scientific approach that addressed the Indonesian national curriculum. The Acid-Base Chemical Literacy Test (A-BCLT) consisted of 19 items that used four contexts. Argumentative question added on each context. The other instrument was the SHOM scale in the SSI context. The scale consisted of 20 items in seven factors of SHOM. A group of experts looked at both instruments to ensure content validity. Then, the empirical test showed that both instruments have good reliability. MANOVA as the inferential statistic technique was used to analyze the differences among the group. The results showed that there was a significant difference in SHOM and students’ chemical literacy simultaneously. However, there was only a significant difference in students’ chemical literacy on separate analyses. Students have a better scientific argument in the case of acid rain as SSI, but it was less good for consumption of ulcer medicine for fasting people. Meanwhile, for SHOM, students have better thinking in open-mindedness and objectivity factors but less on curiosity. Some of the interesting findings and their implications are discussed in this study. The integration of SSI in chemistry learning is important. It is meaningful in promoting students’ thinking skills to become responsible citizens in the future.

Highlights

  • The development of science and technology exposes everyone to a life that is always developing with complex problems

  • Test of between-subjects effects showed that there was a difference for students “chemical literacy (p = 0.000 with an effective contribution of 32.2%), and there was no significant difference for the scientific habits of mind (SHOM) studies” (p = 0.663)

  • The result was relevant to the calculation of the effect of treatment based on the partial eta square value of Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) where the inquiry learning using socio-scientific issue (SSI) context does not partially affect students’ SHOM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The development of science and technology exposes everyone to a life that is always developing with complex problems These problems are related to aspects of physical or non-physical environmental conditions, health quality, or social and economic life. This condition requires everyone to be wiser in making decisions in life. Socioscientific issues (SSIs) were reported as a potential topic to make chemistry learning relevant (e.g., Eilks et al, 2018; Zowada et al, 2020) since it helped students to connect the scientific concepts and social problems in their daily lives (Capkinoglu et al, 2019). Previous studies showed that bringing SSI in science learning improved students’ decision making (Rizal et al, 2017; Christenson et al, 2014, and students’ awareness toward environmental and daily problems (e.g., Juntunen and Aksela, 2013; Korolija et al, 2015; Drury et al, 2016; Shamuganathan and Karpudewan, 2017)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call