Promoting shared health care decision making using the analytic hierarchy process

Abstract

Recent developments in medical technology and bioethics have led to a shift in the traditional framework of physician–patient responsibility in health care decision making. Patients are increasingly participating in serious health care decisions, resulting in a “shared decision-making model“ that both patients and their doctors agree is a significant improvement over the traditional system in which a doctor served as the primary decision maker. However, patients are finding they need to develop strategies that allow them to understand and evaluate their health care options in a clear manner. T.L. Saaty’s “Analytic Hierarchy Process” (AHP) is a decision methodology that has been successfully applied to a wide variety of situations and has great potential as a methodology for improved shared health care decision making. This paper reports the results of an experimental use of AHP as a tool to facilitate shared decision making for two specific health care populations. Both groups of patients were deciding amongst their options in terms of two important elective health care procedures: estrogen replacement therapy and cosmetic eyelid surgery. After using AHP, the majority of both patients and physicians agreed that this technique improved physician–patient communication, thus greatly assisting shared health care decisions. When considering other criteria in addition to physician–patient communication, including the entire physician–patient relationship, the patients felt that AHP was preferable to the conventional doctor-patient mode of decision making.