Abstract
BackgroundOver the past decade, hospitals in many countries, including Israel, have undergone an accreditation process aimed at improving the quality of services provided. This process also refers to the protection and promotion of patients’ rights. However, reviewing the criteria and content included in this category in the Israeli context reveals definitions and implications that differ from those presented by the law – specifically the Patient’s Rights Act 1995. Moreover, the rights included in it are not necessarily equally represented in other legislation.MethodsThis study seeks to examine the question of whether and to what extent the scope, contents, and definitions of patients’ rights in the JCI Standards are similar to or different from patients’ rights as they are addressed and protected in national legislation.The article provides a comparison and examination of the different regulatory frameworks of patients’ rights, especially those in the accreditation of healthcare institution and legislation, analyzes the gaps between such frameworks, and suggests possible implications on our understanding of the concept of patients’ rights.ResultsThe patients’ right chapter in the accreditation process introduces and promotes the concepts of patient and family rights, increases the awareness and compliance of such concepts, and may create greater consistency in their introduction and application.ConclusionsDiscussion of the Israeli case not only demonstrates how regulatory frameworks are instrumental – for broader policy purposes, especially in the area of patients’ rights and the rights of patients’ families – but also calls for a more general examination of the concept of patients’ rights in health policies and its contribution to the quality of health services. Reference to patients’ rights in accreditation of healthcare institutions may promote and enhance this concept and contribute to the delivery of care, thereby complementing a lacuna in the law.
Highlights
Over the past decade, hospitals in many countries, including Israel, have undergone an accreditation process aimed at improving the quality of services provided
The term Accreditation relates to the process in which an external body performs an evaluation of an organization or service using a set of standards for measuring process and performance [7,8,9]
The researchers discussed and agreed upon the most relevant legislation sections in all of the potentially appropriate Acts. This resulted in the following five Acts determined by the authors to be valid and applicable in Israel for specifying and protecting patients’ rights:: the National Health Insurance Act (NHA), 1995; The Patient’s Rights Act (PRA), 1997; the Dying Patient Act (DPA), 2005; The Equal Rights for Persons with Disabilities (ERPDL), 2006, and the Organ Transplant Act (OTA), 2008
Summary
Hospitals in many countries, including Israel, have undergone an accreditation process aimed at improving the quality of services provided. This process refers to the protection and promotion of patients’ rights. The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is a fundamental right for every human being [1]. In this context, such a right is understood as a standard of living that is adequate for the health and wellbeing of every person and all family members [2]. The common objective of the process is to improve the quality indicators of organizations and sectors and to provide a basis for comparison – with other organizations in the same sector or among divisions and departments within the same organization [13]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
