Abstract

<p>A number of studies have been undertaken about the mental health of law students and the reports as to the findings of those studies have all expressed concern about the high levels of psychological distress suffered by them. Australian studies indicate that while university students suffer from emotional distress at a rate greater than that of the general population and at a higher rate than their non-student (age group) peers, law students are more distressed than their university peers. This has led to many calls for action.</p><p><br />Most law students undertake their degree with a view to practising law. It is now also accepted that legal practitioners suffer depression or emotional distress at higher rates than other professionals, other workers more generally and the general population. Research shows that there is a strong correlation between high levels of emotional distress and the incidence of mental illness. Law students suffering high or very high distress levels are therefore at an increased risk of suffering a mental illness, most commonly anxiety and/or depression.</p><p>Faced with this problem, the question arises: how should legal education institutions respond? This article describes the approach taken by one legal education institution, The College of Law, Australia (the College), in answering this question. The College identified the value in improving students’ mental health literacy and stress management and now trains its lecturers to deliver an educational workshop (the workshop) in these areas. The workshop forms part of the core curriculum for the College’s practical legal training program (PLT).</p><p>Part 2 of the article reviews some of the literature about health promotion, health literacy, mental health literacy and promoting student wellbeing, providing the underpinnings for the intervention. Part 3 describes the development of the workshop for pre-admission graduate law students. Part 4 outlines the content of the workshop and delivery methods. Part 5 considers evaluations of the workshop, from both the student and teacher perspective and student learning outcomes, and Part 6 contains recommendations based on our experience in designing and delivering the workshop.</p>

Highlights

  • A number of studies have been undertaken about the mental health of law students and the reports as to the findings of those studies have all expressed concern about the high levels of psychological distress[4] suffered by them.[5]

  • Later in the paper we argue that this analysis might assist legal education institutions by providing a framework to inform the design of mental health education programs for law students

  • Given the findings of the BMRI study, decreasing stigmatising attitudes should be an important aim in developing any mental health initiative for law students and this study demonstrates that the teaching of mental health literacy has the capacity to do this

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A number of studies have been undertaken about the mental health of law students and the reports as to the findings of those studies have all expressed concern about the high levels of psychological distress[4] suffered by them.[5]. It is accepted that legal practitioners suffer depression or emotional distress at higher rates than other professionals, other workers more generally and the general population.[9]. The catalyst for change for the authors of this article was their attendance at the first of the annual public lectures in 2006 organised by The Tristan Jepson Memorial Foundation (TJMF).[83] The TJMF was established by the parents of Tristan Jepson, a former law student at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) who took his life at age 26 after a period of suffering from severe clinical depression. At the outset TJMF focused on two initiatives, one for law students and the second an annual public lecture targeting the legal profession. Our initial question was; Is there an educational role in preparing law graduates for practice from a mental health point of view?

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.