Abstract

Interprofessional (IP) experiences are increasing in frequency and scope in health professions education, though little is known about the role of the co-curricular environment in fostering students’ attitudes towards IP collaboration. We examined if participants in IP co-curricular activities of substantive duration held attitudes toward IP learning and collaboration differently than students who did not participate in such activities. We distributed a questionnaire composed of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) and the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS) to the 2008, 2009, and 2010 graduates of an academic health center. Respondents indicated if they participated in any of the six substantive IP co-curricular activities offered by the institution. Respondents were grouped by participation in “one or more IP activity” or “no participation.” Independent sample T-tests were performed for each of the RIPLS and IEPS scales to assess differences between those groups. 997 (58.1%) of the graduates completed the survey; 52.9% of the respondents reporting participation in at least one IP activity. Of the seven scales from the two instruments, the mean scores of one scale were significantly different between the two groups: IEPS “perceived need for cooperation” (p Results indicate that students who have participated in a substantive IP co-curricular activity hold more positive attitudes toward the perceived need for cooperation. It is likely that as a result of their IP collaborative experiences, these students recognize the value and need for cooperation. It appears that important IP collaborative learning occurs within the IP co-curricular environment, and in turn, may translate into improved use of IP collaboration skills in practice.

Highlights

  • Interprofessional education (IPE) is identified as a means to improve health professions training and prepare practitioners to provide effective patient-centered collaborative care (Institute of Medicine, 2003; World Health Organization, 2010)

  • With the release of the Interprofessional Education Collaborative core competencies for IP collaborative practice in May 2011 in the U.S (Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel, 2011), it is anticipated that further momentum in IPE across health professions programs will occur

  • That we did not find significant differences on the other scales represented by the instruments likely reflects that as IP co-curricular experiences, students did not typically engage in roles related to their profession, and attitudes related to roles, responsibilities, and professional identify would not have been influenced strongly through participation in the IP co-curricular activity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interprofessional education (IPE) is identified as a means to improve health professions training and prepare practitioners to provide effective patient-centered collaborative care (Institute of Medicine, 2003; World Health Organization, 2010). A variety of IPE courses and educational activities within United States schools are reported in the literature (Davidson & Waddell, 2005; Harward, Tresolini, & Davis, 2006; Mitchell et al, 2006; Rose et al, 2009; Yarborough, Jones, Cyr, Phillips, & Stelzner, 2000). These, and the report by Blue, Zoller, Stratton, Elam, & Gilbert (2010) about the presence of IPE in U.S medical schools, provide evidence that such work appears to be increasing in frequency and scope. Consistent with scholarly consensus, we refer to IPE as occasions “when two or more professions learn about, from, and with each other to enable effective collaboration and improve.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call