Abstract

This study investigates factors that promote substantive posts and higher order critical thinking in online discussions. The authors compared weekly discussion threads from two online Principles of Macroeconomics courses. One class was considered a low-structure class while the other class was considered a more structured class. Students’ posts were coded following the Gilbert and Dabbagh (2005) coding system. The codes were mapped to Bloom’s Taxonomy. A comparison of means indicate that there was an increase in mean substantive posts from 72 percent in 2008 to 89 percent in 2011. There was an increase in the percentage of posts in higher levels of critical thinking from 11 percent in 2008 to 60 percent in 2011. Analysis of student and instructor posting patterns revealed that structured instructor posts and having a “By Wednesday” requirement promote meaningful online discussions and increased substantive student posts in the higher order critical thinking category. This approach links substantive and quality students’ posts to students’ understanding of the core learning outcomes for the course using Bloom’s taxonomy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.