Abstract
The paleoxylology of coniferous woods has progressed considerably since Kräusel's last (incomplete) synthesis in 1949. Nomenclatural practice has slowly purged itself of the diagnostic use of etymology. The use of certain new words or phrases has become essential, while other words have been subject to significant semantic drift or unjustified omission. The interest of secondary characters was highlighted. Ways of describing have also evolved, sometimes in divergent ways. The list of characters (and states) published by the International Association of Wood Anatomists in 2004 represents a fundamental step towards a standardization of practices. However, it does not take into account some of the particularities of palaeoxylology. Here we propose: (1) a plea that etymology should definitely no longer be considered diagnostic; (2) a standardized format for the description of fossil tracheidoxyls; (3) an illustrated glossary of certain terms specific to paleoxylology.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
