Abstract

Internationally, conceptual and procedural understanding, understanding the Nature of Science, and scientific literacy are considered worthy goals of school science education in modern times. The empirical study presented here reports on promising teacher practices that in the students’ views afford learning opportunities and support their science learning. The research is an illuminating case study of learning science in a large urban coeducational high school in New Zealand. The participants were one science teacher and his class of 28 students (age 13/14 years). Data were collected through classroom observations (63 lessons), a questionnaire, and interviews with all students in groups of 4/5. Illuminating examples of the six most promising practices and student views about how these practices helped them to learn science are presented. Practical work was common in the study class and was analysed for its effectiveness. The research was underpinned by a constructivist theory of learning.

Highlights

  • Learning science in school involves developing conceptual and procedural understanding as well as understanding the Nature of Science (Author 2015; Lederman &Abell, 2014; Millar, 2012;Schwartz, Lederman, & Crawford, 2004)

  • The current focus of science education for this millennium is for all students to be scientifically literate citizens (Hodson, 2014;McFarlane, 2013)

  • A further focus has been to make science “authentic” for the learner which has led to an analysis of scientific thinking from a psychological cognitive perspective (Zimmerman & Croker, 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Learning science in school involves developing conceptual and procedural understanding as well as understanding the Nature of Science (Author 2015; Lederman &Abell, 2014; Millar, 2012;Schwartz, Lederman, & Crawford, 2004). The current focus of science education for this millennium is for all students to be scientifically literate citizens (Hodson, 2014;McFarlane, 2013). The belief is that such citizens will be able to make informed decisions about socio-scientific developments and rapidly growing new technologies that are likely to impact on their everyday lives. A further focus has been to make science “authentic” for the learner which has led to an analysis of scientific thinking from a psychological cognitive perspective (Zimmerman & Croker, 2014). A further focus has been to make science “authentic” for the learner which has led to an analysis of scientific thinking from a psychological cognitive perspective (Zimmerman & Croker, 2014). Gunstone, Fensham, and Gunstone (2013) provide a critical perspective of science learning through taking a constructivist approach

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call