Prolotherapy Versus Phonophoresis and Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of prolotherapy with phonophoresis and steroid injection in patients with plantar fasciitis (PF). One hundred forty-six patients with PF were randomly divided into prolotherapy, phonophoresis, and injection groups. The treatment method to be applied to them was determined by drawing lots of equal numbers of papers with "Prolotherapy," "Corticosteroid," and "Phonophoress" written on it among those who accepted to be treated. Patients were evaluated using heel sensitivity index (HSI), visual analog scale (VAS), foot function index (FFI), and Short Form (SF)-36 at baseline, first and third months after the therapy. Plantar fascia thickness (PFT) was measured by ultrasonography (USG) at baseline, first and third months after the therapy. Statistically significant improvements were found in all parameters at 1 and 3 months after treatment in all groups (p < .05). There was no significant difference between VAS and FFI scores between the 3 groups (p > .05). Improvement in the HSI (p=.021) and SF-36 general health (GH) subscales at the third month after treatment in the prolotherapy group was significantly better at the first and third months compared to the other groups (p=.033 and p < .01). No complications were observed in any of the patients. Our study results suggest that prolotherapy, phonophoresis, and steroid injection are beneficial as safe treatment modalities in the early period of PF treatment. The improvement of HSI and SF-36 GH subscale lasts longer with prolotherapy, but ultrasonographic findings do not change in the third month of these treatment applications.