Abstract
As documented by Darwin 150 years ago, emotion expressed in human faces readily draws our attention and promotes sympathetic emotional reactions. How do such reactions to the expression of emotion affect our goal-directed actions? Despite the substantial advance made in the neural mechanisms of both cognitive control and emotional processing, it is not yet known well how these two systems interact. Here, we studied how emotion expressed in human faces influences cognitive control of conflict processing, spatial selective attention and inhibitory control in particular, using the Eriksen flanker paradigm. In this task, participants viewed displays of a central target face flanked by peripheral faces and were asked to judge the gender of the target face; task-irrelevant emotion expressions were embedded in the target face, the flanking faces, or both. We also monitored how emotion expression affects gender judgment performance while varying the relative timing between the target and flanker faces. As previously reported, we found robust gender congruency effects, namely slower responses to the target faces whose gender was incongruent with that of the flanker faces, when the flankers preceded the target by 0.1 s. When the flankers further advanced the target by 0.3 s, however, the congruency effect vanished in most of the viewing conditions, except for when emotion was expressed only in the flanking faces or when congruent emotion was expressed in the target and flanking faces. These results suggest that emotional saliency can prolong a substantial degree of conflict by diverting bottom-up attention away from the target, and that inhibitory control on task-irrelevant information from flanking stimuli is deterred by the emotional congruency between target and flanking stimuli.
Highlights
Emotion expressions are crucial for survival, allowing others to immediately infer one’s own internal state via various facial or bodily expressions
In Experiment 1, we manipulated the location of emotional saliency by provoking emotional reactivity either in the target face or in the flanking faces
In Experiment 3, we manipulated the presence or absence of emotional conflict as a means of regulating emotional reactivity. We examined how these manipulations affected cognitive control of conflict processing by comparing congruency effects using the Eriksen flanker paradigm (Eriksen and Eriksen, 1974)
Summary
Emotion expressions are crucial for survival, allowing others to immediately infer one’s own internal state via various facial or bodily expressions. Emotionally salient or emotion-provoking images are detected more effectively and look more vivid when embedded in other images or visual noise, compared to other non-emotional but salient images (Ohman et al, 2001; Vuilleumier et al, 2001; Pinkham et al, 2010; Hodsoll et al, 2011; Todd et al, 2012) While these results indicate that emotion expression has beneficial effects when the object expressing emotion is the target of attention, other studies have found that emotionally arousing stimuli hamper the perception of peripheral stimuli, both in space or time (Most et al, 2005; Blair et al, 2007; Ciesielski et al, 2010; Kennedy and Most, 2012). Objects expressing emotion can affect sensory encoding at the expense of objects nearby
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
