Abstract
BackgroundThe loss of a spouse is a major life event. Previous research found that centrality of the loss to one's identity using Centrality of Event Scale (CES) is related to complicated bereavement reactions, such as depression, posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTS), and prolonged grief symptoms (PGS). This study aims to examine loss-centrality in elderly bereaved people up to 4 years post loss, to determine the relation of loss-centrality to complicated bereavement reactions, such as PGS, depression, and PTS, and to identify early predictors of loss-centrality. MethodSelf-reported data were collected from 208 elderly bereaved people (mean age 72 years, 63.9% women), who completed measures of psychological distress (PTS, depression, PGS) as well as intra- and interpersonal factors (coping-style, crisis support, satisfaction with life, and NEO-PI-R) at 2, 6, and 48 months post spousal loss. CES was measured 48 months post spousal loss. ResultsIn line with previous findings (Boelen, 2012a), loss-centrality 4 years following the loss was significantly related to depression, PTS, and PGS. Additionally, early PGS and gender predicted later loss-centrality. LimitationsSelf-repport data was used rather than clinical interviews. CES was only measured 48 months post loss. PGS was first measured 6 months post. ConclusionsThe results support the link between loss-centrality and post loss psychopathology in a population particularly vulnerable to complicated bereavement reactions. The close link between prolonged grief and CES may be relevant in developing treatments for PGS, especially considering the potential relationship between high CES, high PGS, and possibly lack of acceptance of the loss.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.