Abstract
This paper explores how gender determined metaphors may influence theoretical constructs. It provides a historical review of how the deconstruction of male metaphors has influenced changes in drive and structural theories and examines the influence of male metaphors on object relations theory. Specifically, the construct of projective identification is explored in relation to inconsistencies in how it is conceptualized and how it is a construct more in keeping with a male model of development. The self-in-relation model of female development is explored in order to offer an alternative construction of similar clinical phenomena. Through a feminine metaphoric lens these phenomena could be seen as relational introjections. The latter conceptualization is also supported by early infant research and current literature on intersubjectivity in the therapeutic process. A case vignette is used to illustrate how a particular piece of therapeutic work could be conceptualized as either projective identification or relational introjection.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
