Abstract

ObjectiveTo refine a new technique to measure respiratory-resolved left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) in mid-inspiration and mid-expiration using a respiratory self-gating technique and demonstrate clinical feasibility in patients.Materials and methodsTen consecutive patients were imaged at 1.5 T during 10 min of free breathing using a 3D golden-angle radial trajectory. Two respiratory self-gating signals were extracted and compared: from the k-space center of all acquired spokes, and from a superior–inferior projection spoke repeated every 64 ms. Data were binned into end-diastole and two respiratory phases of 15% respiratory cycle duration in mid-inspiration and mid-expiration. LVED volume and septal–lateral diameter were measured from manual segmentation of the endocardial border.ResultsRespiratory-induced variation in LVED size expressed as mid-inspiration relative to mid-expiration was, for volume, 1 ± 8% with k-space-based self-gating and 8 ± 2% with projection-based self-gating (P = 0.04), and for septal–lateral diameter, 2 ± 2% with k-space-based self-gating and 10 ± 1% with projection-based self-gating (P = 0.002).DiscussionMeasuring respiratory variation in LVED size was possible in clinical patients with projection-based respiratory self-gating, and the measured respiratory variation was consistent with previous studies on healthy volunteers. Projection-based self-gating detected a higher variation in LVED volume and diameter during respiration, compared to k-space-based self-gating.

Highlights

  • Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a routine part of the diagnostic work-up in heart disease

  • Many of the methods are still sensitive to respiratory motion, which is often resolved by performing the acquisition during breath holding

  • Projection-based respiratory self-gating from superior–inferior spokes was able to detect the respiratory motion in terms of both respiratory phase and amplitude when visually comparing to the measured bellows signal

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a routine part of the diagnostic work-up in heart disease. An advantage of CMR is the variety of physiological and dynamic imaging methods available. Many of the methods are still sensitive to respiratory motion, which is often resolved by performing the acquisition during breath holding. Breath holding can be difficult for patients to sustain and often leads to degraded image quality and motion blurring [1]. Patients who would benefit from respiratory-resolved evaluation of LV volume are those with stiffness changes in the myocardium or pericardium [8]. Filling of the right ventricle is affected by the pressure changes in the chest during respiration in healthy individuals [9].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.