Abstract

Promising multi-dose HIV vaccine regimens are being tested in trials in South Africa. We estimated the potential epidemiological and economic impact of HIV vaccine campaigns compared to continuous vaccination, assuming that vaccine efficacy is transient and dependent on immune response. We used a dynamic economic mathematical model of HIV transmission calibrated to 2012 epidemiological data to simulate vaccination with anticipated antiretroviral treatment scale-up in South Africa. We estimate that biennial vaccination with a 70% efficacious vaccine reaching 20% of the sexually active population could prevent 480,000–650,000 HIV infections (13.8–15.3% of all infections) over 10 years. Assuming a launch price of $15 per dose, vaccination was found to be cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $13,746 per quality-adjusted life-year as compared to no vaccination. Increasing vaccination coverage to 50% will prevent more infections but is less likely to achieve cost-effectiveness. Campaign vaccination is consistently more effective and costs less than continuous vaccination across scenarios. Results suggest that a partially effective HIV vaccine will have substantial impact on the HIV epidemic in South Africa and offer good value if priced less than $105 for a five-dose series. Vaccination campaigns every two years may offer greater value for money than continuous vaccination reaching the same coverage level.

Highlights

  • The string of successes reported in HIV prevention in the last decade, including the reduction of mother-to-child transmission, interventions like male circumcision, and the introduction of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), have created optimism that global eradication of HIV is within reach

  • We used a deterministic compartmental model to simulate the transmission of HIV in a population of 15–49-year-olds in South Africa, with a system of differential equations representing the flow of individuals between compartments over time

  • Recent intervention programs focussing on universal access to treatment and increased delivery of antiretroviral therapy (ART) to HIV-positive individuals have to be balanced with effective HIV prevention strategies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The string of successes reported in HIV prevention in the last decade, including the reduction of mother-to-child transmission, interventions like male circumcision, and the introduction of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), have created optimism that global eradication of HIV is within reach. Subsequent analyses, including immune correlates and viral sieve studies, provided additional evidence that the benefit was likely real[9,10,11,12] The confluence of these results would be unlikely if the vaccine efficacy were truly zero; taken together, they support a high likelihood of some beneficial efficacy and a cohesive model of a correlate of protection[13]. The HVTN 702 vaccine regimen was designed to improve the level and durability of protection observed in the Thai trial. It consists of two experimental vaccines: a canarypox vector-based vaccine called ALVAC-HIV and a bivalent subtype C gp[120] protein vaccine with MF59 adjuvant to enhance immune response. An earlier phase 1 trial (HVTN 100) provided the necessary evidence to launch this large-scale efficacy trial[16]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call