Abstract

Rationale and Objectives The authors performed this study to determine, in the context of a teaching presentation with slides, the information content needed in a digitized radiologic image for it to be equivalent in quality to an analog image. Materials and Methods Eleven sets of radiologic images were obtained from a teaching file collection and digitized. The images were scanned at high resolution and saved as image files. The information content of each image was then halved repeatedly with repeat sampling of the image. This procedure was repeated nine times to yield a total of 10 images with an information content that ranged from very low (32 kB) to high (12 MB). Each of these image files was made into a 35-mm slide by using a digital slide maker. The original radiographs were subsequently made into slides by using conventional photographic methods. Care was taken to make the images identical in every respect except digitization and information content. The slides were shown to radiologists, who filled out questionnaires to rate image quality. Results Digitized slides that contain an average of 416 kB of data (the equivalent of a 750 × 570-pixel matrix with 8-bit gray levels) were equivalent to analog images for 90% of viewers. At 830 kB (1,060 × 800-pixel matrix with 8-bit gray levels), 100% of viewers found no difference between digitized and analog images. Conclusion Digital images become indistinguishable from analog images if a sufficient amount of information is retained in the digital image. There is a defined relationship between the perception of quality and the information content of a digital image.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.