Abstract

Project-based learning (PBL) is a constructivist approach to learning which has been used successfully in a variety of settings and has received recognition as a method of enabling students to acquire 21st century skills (Cyprian, 2014: & Al- Ali, 2015). Some (Al-Saifi, 2016; Taskin-Can, 2011; & Baysura et al., 2016) have argued that if pre-service teachers are to be effective at implementing PBL with their students, they need repeated experiential exposure to the model in their university teacher training programs. One area of investigation has focused on the ability of pre-service teachers to implement the PBL model within their own classroom instructional experiences despite demonstrating adequate knowledge about PBL in their university coursework. The purpose of this manuscript is to address the value of preparing pre-service teachers to be K-12 science teachers through immersing them in PBL methodology in order to enhance their future teaching practices by modeling PBL teaching methodology in their university courses. It also sheds the light on online implementation of PBL and technology integration. 45 relevant studies have been reviewed in this manuscript. The challenges of implementing PBL found in the literature were mainly related to four: programs' policy, professional development, environment, and students’ willingness. Professional development sessions for faculty members, partnerships with local and international organizations specialists in this area of learning, and continuous evaluation of the current programs can be helpful strategies in achieving successful implementation of PBL in teacher preparation programs. Implementing PBL in teacher preparation programs contributes in fully integrating theory and practice; and positively influences student teachers’ professional, academic and personal skills.

Highlights

  • Dewey (1916) wrote “Give the pupils something to do, not something to learn; and the doing is of such a nature as to demand thinking; learning naturally results” (p. 191)

  • The results showed that while students scored in the first assessment, when students were provided the same assessment one year later students who had learned the material in traditional instructional environments recalled 15% of the information tested while students who learned the material through Project Based Learning (PBL) were able to recall 70% of the skills and knowledge (Cyprian, 2014)

  • The researchers suggested the adoption of PBL in teaching pre-service teachers and confirmed the need to conduct additional research verifying the effect of PBL in Arab countries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dewey (1916) wrote “Give the pupils something to do, not something to learn; and the doing is of such a nature as to demand thinking; learning naturally results” (p. 191). They found that PBL helped in shaping pre-service teachers’ professional identity including self-confidence and professional growth and gaining meaningful experience in terms of overcoming challenges and collaborating with their peers These skills play role in keeping pre-service teachers motivated in their teaching practices. Mahasneh and Alwan (2018) found significant differences in self-efficacy and achievement scores of pre-service teachers who experienced PBL compared with the control group who did not experience PBL Based on this finding, the researchers suggested the adoption of PBL in teaching pre-service teachers and confirmed the need to conduct additional research verifying the effect of PBL in Arab countries. Participants confirmed the benefits of PBL professional development sessions on their own practices They expressed that finding a community partner, identifying a project that fits students’ needs, making students work effectively in a group work, and the difficulty of evaluating projects as challenges of implementing PBL in higher education. The manuscript examined the following research questions: (a) To what extend does PBL achieve the combination between theory and practice? (b) How is PBL different from other related instructions? (c) Is PBL appropriate for remote learning?

The Combination between Theory and Practice
The Value of Combining Theory and Practice
The Differences between PBL and Other Related Instructions
Conceptual and Factual Knowledge
Metacognition
Procedural Knowledge
The Steps of PBL
The Challenges of Implementing PBL
Implementing PBL Remotely
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call