Abstract

UNTIL 1950 the syndrome of ptosis and ophthalmoplegia was generally considered to be neurogenic in origin as indicated by the designation progressive nuclear ophthalmoplegia. This concept was based upon two cases1,2in which there were neuronal abnormalities in postmortem study of the oculomotor nuclei. In 1951, however, Kiloh and Nevin3concluded that the signs were due to because of histological abnormalities in the medial rectus muscle in one case; they considered the neural changes of earlier cases to be insignificant, and they introduced the terms ocular myopathy or ocular dystrophy. Their view dominated the subsequent literature, and six later autopsy cases4-9also supported the concept of myopathy. In our own experience, however, the same syndrome has sometimes been associated with a variety of neurological abnormalities. There have also been several reports10-31of similar cases associated with neural disease. These combined disorders raise

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.