Abstract

The study tests the hypothesis that Russia’s transition from flat to progressive income taxation will produce revenue that would be sufficient for the advancement of high-tech industries. To test this hypothesis, we considered two scenarios of the reform – the two-tiered system, which has been implemented since 2021, and the project of a four-tiered system proposed by the Liberal Democratic Party. To estimate the effects of the tax reform, we calculated the revenues from taxing high-income taxpayer groups and subgroups at specific tax rates. As a result, it was found that the reform could produce 187 billion Rubles in extra revenue, which means that there is a vast discrepancy between the calculated estimates and the government’s expectations (60 billion Rubles). In other words, the Russian government significantly underestimates the potential of the income tax. According to the second scenario, which aims to build a more sophisticated income tax system, the revenue would be 1.1 trillion Rubles. Thus, a well-designed scale of the personal income tax will enable the government to considerably enhance this tool’s fiscal efficiency. The calculations of the extra revenue generated by the reform relied on the statistics of the World Inequality Database (WID) for 2019. To test the relevance of the input and output data, we conducted a comparative analysis at the micro-level by looking at the wage levels in Russian, American and European space corporations. We found that the micro-economic data are closer to the WID statistics rather than to Rosstat, which confirmed the accuracy of our results. Our calculations have confirmed the general hypothesis and showed that the extra revenue from the reform will enable the government to fully modernize microelectronics and the geothermal industry in Russia.

Highlights

  • Russia belongs to the group of countries whose fiscal policy is based on taxing legal entities rather than individuals

  • The above-described calculations shed some light on the effects of the tax reform and will be used to test our hypothesis regarding its redistributive potential

  • This contradicts the results of the above-cited study based on the World Inequality Database (WID) statistics, which demonstrates that the reform holds a great fiscal potential and will be able to help the country redistribute wealth more efficiently, significantly contributing to its economic modernization

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Russia belongs to the group of countries whose fiscal policy is based on taxing legal entities rather than individuals. Progressive taxation, especially the personal income tax (PIT), has been seen as an instrument to tackle excessive social inequality (in Russia the PIT is officially referred to as the tax on the income of physical persons (NDFL)). This instrument is quite common in many countries of the world, in Russia it has been underused for a long time. The PIT rate was raised for individuals earning an annual income of more than 5 million rubles from 13 to 15%. The higher tax rate applies only to the amount in excess of 5 million rubles per year

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call