Abstract

BackgroundPatients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) have a high frequency of stroke recurrence. However, there has been little investigation into the prognostic value of higher‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR‐MRI).PurposeTo investigate the use of intracranial atherosclerotic plaques features in predicting risk of recurrent cerebrovascular ischemic events using HR‐MRI.Study TypeProspective.PopulationFifty‐eight patients with acute/subacute stroke (N = 46) or transient ischemic attack (N = 12).Field Strength/SequenceA 3.0 T, 3D time‐of‐flight gradient echo sequence and T1‐ and T2‐weighted fast spin echo sequences with 0.31 x 0.39 mm2 in‐plane resolution, twice (with >3 months between scans) following the initial event.AssessmentPatients were also followed clinically for recurrent ischemic events for up to 48 months or until a subsequent event occurred. The degree of stenosis, plaque burden (PB), minimal lumen area (MLA), and contrast enhancement ratio were assessed at each scanning session and the percentage change of each over time was calculated.Statistical TestsUnivariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for predicting recurrent events.ResultsThe mean time interval between baseline and follow‐up MRI scans was 6.2 ± 4.1 months. After the second MRI scan, 20.7% of patients (N = 12) had experienced ipsilateral recurrent TIA/stroke within 10.9 ± 9.2 months. Univariable analyses showed that baseline triglyceride, percentage change of PB, and progression of PB were significantly associated with recurrent events (all P < 0.05). Multivariable Cox regression indicated that progression of PB (HR, 6.293; 95% CI, 1.620–24.444; P < 0.05) was a significant independent imaging feature for recurrent ischemic events.Data ConclusionProgression of PB was independently associated with recurrent ischemic cerebrovascular events. HR‐MRI may help risk stratification of patients at risk of recurrent stroke.Level of Evidence2Technical EfficacyStage 4

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call