Abstract
Within traditional games design, incorporating progressive difficulty is considered of fundamental importance. But despite the widespread intuition that progression could have clear benefits in Games-With-A-Purpose (GWAPs)–e.g., for training non-expert annotators to produce more complex judgements– progression is not in fact a prominent feature of GWAPs; and there is even less evidence on its effects. In this work we present an approach to progression in GWAPs that generalizes to different annotation tasks with minimal, if any, dependency on gold annotated data. Using this method we observe a statistically significant increase in accuracy over randomly showing items to annotators.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
