Abstract
In the past decade individual and networks of automated meteorological stations have been installed throughout the United States and many other countries. For a variety of reasons, the data collected are being archived in databases; however, quality control/quality assurance procedures, when employed, vary greatly. As a start to possible standardization, screening rules for hourly and daily data values are proposed for quality checking micrometeorological data from individual base stations that record solar irradiance (SI) , precipitation (P) , barometric pressure (Pi,) , vapor pressure (e) , wind speed (u^) , wind direction (Gj) , air temperature (T^) , and three soil temperatures (T^^, and T^j) . Three types of screening rules are considered: (1) high/low range limits (LIM), (2) rate-of-change limits (ROC) , (3) continuous no-observed-change with time liiaits (NOC) . Daily data from historical meteorological records for Ames, lA (30 y) and Treynor, lA (26 y) were available for developing climatic based dynamic data screening rules. Otherwise, instrument ^Contribution of the Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. (Received 1 March 1993; revision accepted 29 October 1993) 'Reprinted with permission from Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 1994, 69(1&2), 85-109. Copyright © 1994 Elsevier Science B.V. ^Mathematician, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service-Midwest Area, National Soil Tilth Laboratory, 2150 Pammel Drive, Ames, lA 50011-4420, USA. Also corresponding author. ^Laboratory Director, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service-Midwest Area, National Soil Tilth Laboratory, 2150 Pammel Drive, Ames, lA 50011-4420, USA. Also Professor (USDA Collciborator) , Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University. specifications and theoretical models were used to develop screening rules for the remaining measurements. Hourly and daily data from well maintained, automated weather stations at Walnut Creek, lA (9 mon) and Treynor, lA (1 y) were used to evaluate and refine the screening rules. Daily data are not flagged often. The most common flag, on either time scale, was on vapor pressure when its value exceeded the 95% relative hiraiidity calibration limit of the sensor. Hourly SI often exceeded a computed extraterrestrial radiation value, particularly at stinset. Rule 1 (LIM) is mainly invoked via observations outside the sensor ranges; rule 2 (ROC) flags abrupt changes; rule 3 (NOC) flags unusually steady periods in the data stream. When used as part of a total field operation eind data processing system, these rules improve the data quality and may help with data exploration.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.