Abstract

Introduction: Progress testing (PT) reflects students’ knowledge development and is a valuable indicator for curriculum evaluation. Since 2009, Faculty of Medicine Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta (FMSH) has been conducting PT every year as a formative assessment. In 2012, curriculum reform was addressed to revise the 2005 curriculum; until then PT and curriculum evaluation were not conducted concurrently. This study aims to evaluate PT and assess whether there is a relationship between PT performance and final scores in modules, as part of curriculum evaluation.Method: It reviews PT for two cohorts: 571 students in 2015 and 562 students in 2016. 120 systembased topics were addressed in the PT. In this study the final scores for the old (2015) and new (2016) curriculum neuropsychiatry modules are reviewed, since their scores were lower than for other modules. Comparisons were made using ANOVA. Pearson correlations were calculated to examine the relationship between PT and final module scores.Results: This study revealed that PT scores between each grade (p < 0.001) from 2015 to 2016 improved significantly (54.49 ± 7.43 and 55.07 ± 8.32; p < 0.001). The mean of the final score of the new neuropsychiatry module was 69.36 ± 3.78 while the old one was 70.92 ± 3.99. Furthermore, Pearson correlation showed a weak correlation between final scores for the neuropsychiatry module and PT scores in 2015 (ρ = 0.191, p = 0.011).Discussion: PT scores increased significantly. Despite the final score of the new neuropsychiatry module being lower than the old one, there was heterogeneity in scores within the old neuropsychiatry module. The small number of neuropsychiatry items in the PT explains why the correlation between PT and final scores was weak. The weak correlation between final scores for the neuropsychiatry module and the PT scores in 2015; PT and final module scores seem reliable as indicators of curriculum evaluation. Further study is needed to analyze more cohort PT scores and modules.International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 05 No. 01 January’21 Page: 62-68

Highlights

  • Progress testing (PT) reflects students’ knowledge development and is a valuable indicator for curriculum evaluation

  • When Faculty of Medicine Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta (FMSH) was established in 2005, its curriculum was adopted from Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia (FMUI) and was followed until 2011

  • We have developed a PT blueprint that is based on the Competency Standards for Indonesian Doctors 2012

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Progress testing (PT) has become widely used in many medical and health institutions all over the world,[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] since it was introduced for the first time in 1970 by the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine and Maastricht University in Netherlands.[11]. It provides feedback to students about how far they have progressed and gets them used to the national exit examination It is a learning-process evaluation for the faculty. As a developing medical school, it is vital that students and faculty are assured by evidence that the learning process in the new curriculum is adequate. PT has some specific objectives that provide feedback for students and for the faculty/institution.[18] Students can assess their own knowledge ability over time, and become familiar with the national exit examination model, which requires higher cognitive abilities. In terms of the Competency Standards for Indonesian Doctors 2012, we create items that require analytical thinking processes rather than recall, and which cover doctor competency levels 3 or 4, as explained below: Level of competency 3a: doctor capable of making clinical diagnoses based on physical and additional examination, such as laboratory examination, X-ray, etc. We conducted the paper-based PT with a time allowance of two hours

Dermatomusculosceletal Hematoimmunology
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University
Educational Quality project from the Indonesia
Student class of year
In future study we will also explore more cohorts’
Findings
Old Neuropsychiatry
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call