Progress on genome-scale metabolic models integrated with multi-omics data

Abstract

The genome-scale metabolic network model (GEM) is a mathematical framework based on gene-protein-reaction associations combined with stoichiometric balance and is capable of facilitating the computation and prediction of multiscale phenotypes by optimizing the objective function of interest. It has been increasingly used as an important tool for understanding cellular metabolism and characterizing cell phenotypes. In cells, metabolism is tightly controlled by intricate regulatory mechanisms at the different system levels and is strictly regulated to ensure the dynamic adaptation of biochemical reaction fluxes for maintaining cell homeostasis to ultimately achieve optimal metabolic fitness. Advances in high-throughput screening and analysis technologies have generated massive amounts of genome sequences, along with transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic data, providing quantitative regulatory information to gain insights into cellular metabolism; however, integrating the available omics data into constraint-based metabolic models and quantitatively profiling genotype-phenotype relationships remains an outstanding challenge for computational biology. Here, we describe the recent developments in introducing macromolecular expression into GEMs and generating metabolic expression (ME) models, which increase the complexity and predictive capability of computational frameworks. Various algorithms employ different approaches to combine additional layers of omics data to limit the cone of allowable flux distributions in the metabolic model. In this review, we categorize all methods by five different grouping criteria and evaluate their practical perspectives. The first category of methods utilizes a threshold to distinguish active and inactive states of the corresponding reactions based on the gene expression measurement data. The second uses omics data to build cell- and tissue-specific models of human metabolism by removing unexpressed reactions from the global human metabolic network. The third category of methods involves modifying reaction bounds on the basis of mRNA and protein abundance, in which the width of the “flux cone” is adjusted via the maximum possible flux in the upper bound of the FBA optimization problem dependent on gene and protein expression levels. The imposition of constraints further defines the associated solution space of the model to improve the prediction accuracy. The fourth model incorporates transcriptional regulation networks (TRNs), which describe the phenomenological interactions between different biomolecules in response to genetic and environmental perturbation, into GEMs and avoids the obstacles of information formulation to achieve comprehensive knowledge regarding the metabolic and regulatory events occurring inside the cell. The last category integrates time-series transcriptomics data with flux-based bilevel optimization to comprehend the interplay between metabolism and regulation in time-dependent processes. We compare the advantages and limitations of different categories and explore the application areas of integrated models in analyzing metabolic characteristics, interpreting phenotypic states and the consequences of environmental and genetic perturbations while discovering potential drug targets and screening anti-metabolic drugs for cancer treatment. Finally, we also highlight the future perspectives and challenges for GEM-based reconstruction with omics data integration.