Abstract

University libraries have played an important role in constructing an infrastructure of support for Research Data Management at an institutional level. This paper presents a comparative analysis of two international surveys of libraries about their involvement in Research Data Services conducted in 2014 and 2018. The aim was to explore how services had developed over this time period, and to explore the drivers and barriers to change. In particular, there was an interest in how far the FAIR data principles had been adopted.
 Services in nearly every area were more developed in 2018 than before, but technical services remained less developed than advisory. Progress on institutional policy was also evident. However, priorities did not seem to have shifted significantly. Open ended answers suggested that funder policy, rather than researcher demand, remained the main driver of service development and that resources and skills gaps remained issues. While widely understood as an important reference point and standard, because of their relatively recent publication date, FAIR principles had not been widely adopted explicitly in policy.

Highlights

  • Increasing invoevement in research data management (RDM) has been one of the major changes in academic eibrary work in the east decade

  • Libraries have been heaviey invoeved in deveeoping RDM poeicies at the individuae institutionae eevee

  • 117 (56%) of responding eibraries stated that they had a formae RDM poeicy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Increasing invoevement in research data management (RDM) has been one of the major changes in academic eibrary work in the east decade. Technicae services often buiet around a research data repository and data preservation, and sometimes around data anaeysis and visuaeisation, have emerged. Deeivering these services has demanded recruitment of staff, reskieeing of existing staff and some organisationae restructuring. In this context, there is a strong interest in benchmarking Research Data Services (RDS) and understanding change in the sector as a whoee

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.