Abstract
The strengths of Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI) lay in its sensitivity, quantitative nature, and lack of signal attenuation for Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPION). These advantages make MPI a powerful tool for the non-invasive monitoring of tracer behaviour over time. With more MPI studies emerging, a standardized method for determining the boundaries of a region of interest (ROI) and iron quantification is crucial. The current approaches are inconsistent, making it challenging to compare studies, hindering MPI progression. Here we showcase three different ROI selection methods for the quantification of iron in vivo and ex vivo. Healthy mice were intravenously administered a long circulating tracer, never before applied in MPI, and the ROI methods were tested for their ability to accurately quantify the total signal present, in addition to the accumulation of the tracer in individual organs. We discuss how the quantified iron amount can be vastly altered based on the choice of ROI, the importance of the standard curve and the challenges associated with each method. Lastly, the user variability and accuracy of each method was compared by 3 independent users to ensure their consistency and lack of bias.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.