Abstract
To evaluate programmed feeding of beef cows fed high concentrate diets as an alternative to hay, 160 spring calving cows (average BW = 510 ± 11 kg) were stratified by age, body condition score (BCS), and BW. The cows were randomly distributed into 10 drought-stricken pastures (16 cows per pasture) on September 11, 1998. Cows on eight pastures were fed one of four diets (two pastures per diet) formulated with corn or corn gluten feed (CGF) and 20% cottonseed hulls (CSH) or rice hulls (RH) for 87 d and compared with cows on two pastures that were allowed free-choice hay plus a supplement. Diets were fed in amounts to meet requirements for NEm and had similar metabolizable protein yields (corn and CSH, 1.8, 17; corn and RH, 2.0, 14; CGF and CSH, 1.5, 23; and CGF and RH, 1.7, 21 NEm/kg and CP percentage, respectively). Data were analyzed in a completely random design by ANOVA; pasture was the experimental unit. Programmed feeding decreased (P<0.08) BW compared with hay diets. By d 87, cows fed RH diets weighed less (P<0.05) than did cows fed CSH diets, and cows fed corn diets weighed less (P<0.05) than did cows fed CGF diets. Body condition score did not differ (P>0.20) among treatments over the feeding period. The cows fed hay plus supplement cost approximately $1.03/d, but the cost of the program-fed cows averaged $0.54/d. After cows were returned to forage-based diets, no differences (P>0.25) were detected among treatments in BW, BCS, calving date, or calf performance. Programmed feeding of high concentrate diets to gestating cows during forage shortages is a viable alternative to feeding hay. Also, when grain prices are favorable, feed costs to maintain gestating cows are lower with grain than with hay plus supplement.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
