Abstract

Prognostics of the remaining useful life (RUL) of lithium-ion batteries is a crucial role in the battery management systems (BMS). An artificial neural network (ANN) does not require much knowledge from the lithium-ion battery systems, thus it is a prospective data-driven prognostic method of lithium-ion batteries. Though the ANN has been applied in prognostics of lithium-ion batteries in some references, no one has compared the prognostics of the lithium-ion batteries based on different ANN. The ANN generally can be classified to two categories: the shallow ANN, such as the back propagation (BP) ANN and the nonlinear autoregressive (NAR) ANN, and the deep ANN, such as the long short-term memory (LSTM) NN. An improved LSTM NN is proposed in order to achieve higher prediction accuracy and make the construction of the model simpler. According to the lithium-ion data from the NASA Ames, the prognostics comparison of lithium-ion battery based on the BP ANN, the NAR ANN, and the LSTM ANN was studied in detail. The experimental results show: (1) The improved LSTM ANN has the best prognostic accuracy and is more suitable for the prediction of the RUL of lithium-ion batteries compared to the BP ANN and the NAR ANN; (2) the NAR ANN has better prognostic accuracy compared to the BP ANN.

Highlights

  • Lithium-ion batteries have been widely used from portable electronics to battery-driven hybrid vehicles owing to their higher energy density, higher output voltage, lower self-discharge, longer lifetime, higher reliability and other advantages compared to other types of batteries available in the market [1,2,3]

  • The nonlinear autoregressive (NAR) artificial neural network (ANN) has the better prognostic accuracy compared to the back propagation (BP) ANN

  • An improved long short-term memory (LSTM) prediction method for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life (RUL) estimation is proposed in this paper

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lithium-ion batteries have been widely used from portable electronics to battery-driven hybrid vehicles owing to their higher energy density, higher output voltage, lower self-discharge, longer lifetime, higher reliability and other advantages compared to other types of batteries available in the market [1,2,3]. The LSTM model has a simple structure and uses it for RUL prediction of lithium-ion batteries It gives the uncertainty of prediction results, and has short training time and can achieve better prediction results in the early, middle and late stages. At the time of writing, this paper is the first to compare the prognostics of the lithium-ion batteries based on different ANN, i.e., BP, NAR, and LSTM.

Data Description
22 A until fell to
Evaluation
N of hidden2 layers and the number of hidden
Different
The NAR NN Model
The LSTM NN Model
The Improved LSTM Model
Discussion
As be seen in Figure the Figure
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.