Abstract

To investigate the prognostic significance of T1 mapping using T1 long and short in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. A total of 263 consecutive patients with HCM referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging were enrolled in this study. The imaging protocol consisted of cine, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), andT1 mappingwith T1 long and short. All patients were followed up prospectively. Outcome events were divided into the primary and secondary endpoint events. Primary endpoint events included cardiac death, heart transplant, aborted sudden death, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation after syncope. The secondary endpoint event was defined as unplanned rehospitalization for heart failure. The average follow-up duration was 28.3 ± 12.1 (range: 1-78) months. In all, 17 patients (7.0%) experienced a primary endpoint including 13 cardiovascular deaths, three aborted sudden deaths, and one resuscitation after syncope, and 34 patients experienced a secondary endpoint. Patients with primary endpoints showed a trend towards more extensive LGE (p < 0.001), significantly higher ECV (p < 0.001), and native T1 (p = 0.028) than those without events. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, ECV was independently associated with primary and secondary endpoints (p < 0.001 and p = 0.047, respectively). For every 3% increase, ECV portended a 1.374-fold increase risk of a primary endpoint occurring (p < 0.001). In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the incidence of primary and secondary endpoint events was significantly higher in HCM with increased ECV (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). In patients with HCM, ECV is a strong imaging marker for predicting adverse outcome. • ECV is a potent imaging index which has a strong correlation with LVEF and LVEDVI and can evaluate myocardial tissue structure and function. • ECV and LGE can provide a prognostic value in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. • ECV has stronger predictive effectiveness than LGE; even in the subgroup with LGE, ECV shows independent predictive significance for adverse events.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.