Abstract

59 Background: Radium-223 (Ra-223) has been approved for the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with predominantly osseous metastases. PSA flare phenomenon with Ra-223 limits the use of PSA as a prognostic tool to predict treatment response. Currently, there is a lack of diagnostic tools to predict treatment response to Ra-223. Therefore, we sought to investigate the role of mid-treatment C-11 choline PET/CT scan in predicting overall response to Ra-223. Methods: In a single institute retrospective study, we identified 32 patients who were treated with a full course of 4-6 cycles of Ra-223 and were evaluated with both PSA and C-11 choline PET scan before treatment, at mid-treatment, and after a complete course of Ra-223 between 2013 – 2018. Ra-223 was used as salvage therapy for their predominant bone disease after failing chemotherapy and 2nd generation hormone therapy. Blind repeat radiographic evaluation of patients’ scans was performed by a radiologist specialized in nuclear radiology. Favorable response was defined by achieving partial response or stable disease on imaging, while unfavorable response was defined by showing progressive disease on imaging. Results: Mean age (±SD) at starting Radium223 was 67.6 (±7.1) years, median (IQR) primary Gleason score was 9 (8-9), and median (IQR) pretreatment PSA was 13.5 (5.4-39.6) ng/ml. 78% of the patients (n=25) completed 6 cycles of Ra-223, 15% of the patients (n=5) completed 5 cycles, and 6% (n=2) received only 4 cycles. At mid-treatment scanning, 25% of the patients (n=8) showed favorable response (Group A), while 75% of the patients (n=24) showed unfavorable response (B). After a complete course of treatment, 62.5% of patients (n=5) in Group (A) continued to show favorable response, while only 8.3% of patients (n=2) in Group (B) showed favorable response (p-value= 0.0023). Conclusions: Mid-treatment evaluation with C-11 choline PET/CT scan can predict overall response to Radium 223. Patients with progressive disease at mid-treatment evaluation are very likely not going to respond to further treatment. Further studies and clinical trials are warranted.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call