Abstract

ObjectiveThe aims of the present study were to evaluate the prognostic value of adrenomedullin (AM) in septic patients in the emergency department (ED) and to compare it with procalcitonin (PCT) and Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score. MethodsWe enrolled 837 consecutive patients who fulfilled the systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria and were admitted to the ED of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and 100 age-matched healthy controls. Serum AM and PCT were determined, and MEDS score was calculated at enrollment. The prognostic value of AM was compared with PCT and MEDS score. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. ResultsOn admission, mean levels of AM were 28.66 ± 6.05 ng/L in 100 healthy controls, 31.65 ± 6.47 ng/L in 153 systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients, 33.24 ± 8.59 ng/L in 376 sepsis patients, 34.81 ± 8.33 ng/L in 210 severe sepsis patients, and 45.15 ± 9.87 ng/L in 98 septic shock patients. The differences between the 2 groups were significant. Adrenomedullin level was higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors in every group. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve of AM for predicting in-hospital mortality in septic patients was 0.773, which was better than PCT (0.701) and MEDS score (0.721). Combination of AM and MEDS score improved the accuracy of AM and MEDS score in predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.817). In logistic regression analysis, AM and MEDS score were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. ConclusionsAdrenomedullin is valuable for prognosis in septic patients in the ED.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.