Abstract
Previous studies have indicated that a deletion on the short arm of chromosome 1 negatively predicts survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Due to the small sample size in each study, we performed this meta-analysis to comprehensively investigate the association between the 1p deletion and survival in patients with MM. A literature search was conducted in both foreign and Chinese databases, including SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 11 eligible articles were extracted or calculated to analyze the pooled HR, which was estimated by fixed-effect or random-effect models based on the heterogeneity between included articles. A subgroup analysis and a meta-regression were conducted, and Galbraith plots were generated to examine any possible heterogeneity. The HRs for OS were available in nine articles, whereas five articles discussed HRs for PFS. The HR with 95%CI was 1.989 (95%CI 1.522-2.600, P=0.017, I(2) =57.1%) when comparing the OS of patients with 1p deletion with the OS of those without this deletion. For PFS, 1p deletion still predicted a poor prognosis (HR 2.11, 95%CI 1.54-2.88, P=0.292, I(2) =19.3%). Moreover, the subgroup analysis suggested that either the deleted gene on 1p or techniques for detecting chromosome abnormalities contributed to the heterogeneity, which was partially consistent with the results derived from a meta-regression analysis and the Galbraith plot method. Our meta-analysis provides globally quantifiable confirmation of the adverse prognostic role of 1p deletion in OS and PFS for patients with MM.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.