Abstract

Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) systems are usually only considered and set up in the late stage of design or even during the system’s lifetime, after the major design decision have been made. However, considering the PHM system’s impact on the system failure probabilities can benefit the system design early on and subsequently reduce costs. The identification of failure paths in the early phases of engineering design can guide the designer toward a safer, more reliable and cost-efficient design. Several functional failure modeling methods have been developed recently. One of their advantages is to allow for risk assessment in the early stages of the design. Risk and reliability functional failure analysis methods currently developed do not explicitly model the PHM equipment used to identify and prevent potential system failures. This paper proposes a framework to optimize prognostic systems selection and positioning during the early stages of a complex system design. A Bayesian network, incorporating the PHM systems, is used to analyze the functional model and failure propagation. The algorithm developed within the proposed framework returns the optimized placement of PHM hardware in the complex system, allowing the designer to evaluate the need for system improvement. A design tool was developed to automatically apply the proposed method. A generic pressurized water nuclear reactor primary coolant loop system is used to present a case study illustrating the proposed framework. The results obtained for this particular case study demonstrate the promise of the method introduced in this paper. The case study notably exhibits how the proposed framework can be used to support engineering design teams in making better informed decisions early in the design phase.

Highlights

  • An increasing number of systems use Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) hardware to detect future failures and allow for preventive maintenance and recovery actions, automated or manual

  • The PHASED methodology presented in this paper aims at incorporating PHM hardware in a system during the early phase of engineering design

  • A reference case is computed by considering no PHM hardware anywhere in the system, which is the nominal case in early design

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An increasing number of systems use Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) hardware to detect future failures and allow for preventive maintenance and recovery actions, automated or manual. Being able to consider prognosis in the early phases by modeling the impact of PHM hardware allows the designer to limit the costly system changes while increasing the system reliability. PHM analyzes past failure data to devise ways to assess the system health based on current monitoring data It can allow for informed condition-based maintenance and extend the system lifetime or prevent failure, limiting cost of maintenance and allowing for a safer, more predictable system (Sun, Zeng, Kang, & Pecht, 2012), (Agarwal, Lybeck, Pham, Rusaw, & Bickford, 2015). More and more complex systems already make extensive use of PHM systems, across various industries such as automotive, aeronautics or nuclear (Coble, Ramuhalli, Bond, Hines, & Upadhyaya, 2015), but widespread industry application is still lagging behind (Lopez, Marquez, Fernandez, & Bolanos, 2014) Those systems are mainly used to reduce maintenance costs by moving toward a more condition-based maintenance schedule. PHM system modeling can, be used in the design phase to make important decisions, drive the probability of failure of components down, and avoid unnecessary design costs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call