Abstract
Arrythmias after Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have a prognostic value, in addition to the morbidity it involves. To evaluate the significance of arrythmias 50 patients of AMI (37-Male, 13-Female) in the age group of 35-72 years were studies, Out of these 50 cases, 48% (n=24) had anterior wall myocardial infarction, 30% (n-15) had inferior wall myocardial infarction, 22% (n=11) had interior+Right Ventricular wall myocardial infarction. Thrombolysis was done in 56% (n=28) patients fulfilling inclusion criteria. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than 50% was present in 24% (n=12) patients. 50% patients (n=25) experienced “In hospital arrythmias” and 28% (n=7) patients had cardiac events in 6 months follow up. In the group without “In hospital arrythmias" 60% (n-15) developed follow up events. Out of 12 patients with LVEF of less than 50% (n=12), 8 patients (66%) developed “In Hospital arrythmias” and 10 patients (83%) developed subsequent morbid cardiac events.
Highlights
Arrythmias after Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have a prognostic value, in addition to the morbidity it involves
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than 50% was present in 24% (n=12) patients. 50% patients (n=25) experienced “In hospital arrythmias” and 28% (n=7) patients had cardiac events in 6 months follow up
Out of 12 patients with LVEF of less than 50% (n=12), 8 patients (66%) developed “In Hospital arrythmias” and 10 patients (83%) developed subsequent morbid cardiac events
Summary
Arrythmias after Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have a prognostic value, in addition to the morbidity it involves. Prognostic Significance of “In hospital Arrythmias” in Acute Myocardial Infarction K. Shrivastava, Dr R.S. Meena, Dr, Naresh Himthani.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have