Abstract
We investigated the prognostic value of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC)/American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) classification and assessed the relationship between pathologic invasiveness and tumor disappearance rate (TDR) in lung adenocarcinoma with ground-glass opacity (GGO). We reviewed data from 202 consecutive patients operated on between 2000 and 2009 for clinical T1-2N0 lung adenocarcinoma with GGO and reclassified their histologic subtypes according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification. Thirty-nine patients had adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), 29 minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), 75 lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinoma (LPA), and 59 non-lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinoma (NLPA). Survival outcomes were compared according to histologic subtype and TDR. The mean age was 58 years and 101 patients (50%) were male. Lobectomy was performed in 161 patients (79.7%), wedge resection in 34 (16.8%), and segmentectomy in 7 (3.5%). Patients with AIS, MIA, and LPA had significantly smaller tumor sizes, earlier pathologic T stages, and lower incidences of lymphatic/pleural invasion than those with NLPA. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 95.1%, 94.5%, and 87.6% in the AIS + MIA, LPA, and NLPA groups, respectively (P=0.029). Tumors with a TDR>75% were associated with lepidic predominant histologic subtype and less pathologic invasiveness. The 5-year RFS rates were 97.4% in tumors with a TDR >75% and 87.8% in tumors with a TDR ≤75% (P=0.0009). Histologic subtype according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification and TDR both correlated with pathologic invasiveness and predicted survival in patients with lung adenocarcinoma with GGO.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.