Prognostic Significance of Heart Rate Variability Among Patients Treated With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of heart rate variability (HRV) for death or heart failure in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D). BackgroundThere are limited data regarding the prognostic value of HRV as a means of identifying high-risk patients treated with CRT-D. MethodsWe analyzed the relationship between pre-implant time-domain (SD of all normal-to-normal RR intervals [SDNN], SDs of averaged 5-min normal-to-normal RR intervals, root mean square of successive differences, and mean of the SDs of all normal-to-normal RR intervals for all 5-min segments of the entire recording), and frequency-domain (low-frequency power, very-low-frequency power [VLF], high-frequency power, low-frequency power/low-frequency power ratio) HRV parameters, and the end point of death or heart failure and death alone. Study subjects include 719 patients in normal sinus rhythm enrolled in MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy); outcomes of CRT-D patients with low HRV (lower tertile) were compared with CRT-D patients with preserved HRV (2 upper tertiles) and with patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators only. ResultsDuring a mean 3.4 ± 0.9 years of follow-up, 124 patients reached the primary end point of death or heart failure, and 47 died. In multivariate analysis, low SDNN (≤93 ms) was associated with significantly higher risk of death or heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12 to 2.36]; p = 0.010) and mortality (HR 2.10 [95% CI: 1.14 to 3.87]; p = 0.017) compared with higher SDNN (>93 ms). Similarly, low VLF (≤179 ms2) was associated with an increased risk of death or heart failure (HR 2.14 [95% CI: 1.46 to 3.13]; p < 0.001) and death alone (HR 2.49 [95% CI: 1.35 to 4.57]; p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in outcome between low HRV patients treated with CRT-D and patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator only. ConclusionsOur findings indicate that autonomic dysfunction (quantified by low SDNN and low VLF) identified patients with no benefit or limited benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pre-implant HRV analysis might help in optimizing qualifications for this treatment.