Prognostic significance of extranodal extension in patients with pathologic N1 non-small cell lung cancer undergoing complete resection.

Abstract

The prognostic significance of extranodal extension (ENE) remains unclear in patients with pathologic N1 (pN1) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing surgery. We evaluated the prognostic impact of ENE in patients with pN1 NSCLC. From 2004 to 2018, we retrospectively analyzed the data of 862 patients with pN1 NSCLC who underwent lobectomy and more (lobectomy, bilobectomy, pneumonectomy, sleeve lobectomy). According to their resection status and the presence of ENE, patients were classified into R0 without ENE (pure R0) (n=645), R0 with ENE (R0-ENE) (n=130), and incomplete resection (R1/R2) groups (n=87). The primary and secondary endpoints were 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), respectively. The prognosis of the R0-ENE group was significantly worse than the pure R0 group for both OS (5-year rate: 51.6% vs. 65.4%, P=0.008) and RFS (44.4% vs. 53.0%, P=0.04). According to the recurrence pattern, a difference of RFS was found only for distant metastasis (55.2% vs. 65.0%, P=0.02). The multivariable Cox analysis revealed that the presence of ENE was a negative prognostic factor in patients who did not undergo adjuvant chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) =1.58; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-2.36; P=0.03], but it was not in those with adjuvant chemotherapy (HR =1.20; 95% CI: 0.80-1.81; P=0.38). For patients with pN1 NSCLC, the presence of ENE was a negative prognostic factor for both OS and RFS, regardless of resection status. The negative prognostic effect of ENE was significantly associated with an increase in distant metastasis and was not observed in patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy.