Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this study was to examine the prognostic value of bone marrow involvement (BMI) assessed by PET-CT in treatment-naïve patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).Patients and methodsAll patients from a single centre diagnosed as DLBCL between 2005 and 2014 had data extracted from staging PET-CT, bone marrow biopsy (BMB), and treatment records. The final diagnosis of BMI was defined as: (i) positive bone marrow biopsy; (ii) positive PET-BMI confirmed by guided biopsy or targeted MR imaging; (iii) concomitant disappearance of bone marrow uptake and uptake in other lymphoma lesions on PET-CT after R-chemotherapy.ResultsOf 169 patients, 20 patients (12%) had BMI on BMB, whereas 35 patients (21%) had positive BMI according to PET-CT findings (PET-BMI(+)). Thirty-three out of the 35 patients with PET-BMI(+) showed a focal pattern and 2 a diffuse pattern, respectively. In multivariate analyses, PET-BMI(+) remained significant for overall survival (OS) (HR 2.90, 95%CI 1.21−6.96, P =0.017) while progressive-free survival (PFS) was significant only in univariate analysis (P<0.001) (Table 1). Among patients with PET-BMI(+) at diagnosis (N=35), patients with SUVmax of bone marrow (SUVmax(BM)) more than 8.6 were significantly associated with high IPI score (3−5) (P =0.002) and worse PFS and OS (P =0.025 and P =0.002, respectively) (Figure 1). In the 68 stage IV cases, three-year OS was higher for patients with negative PET-BMI (PET-BMI (−)) than patients with PET-BMI(+) (84.2%¡À6.5% vs. 44.1%¡À8.6%, respectively; P =0.003) while PFS only shown a trend of statistic significance (P =0.077) between the 2 groups, with estimates of 3-year PFS at 49.3%¡À9.2% and 28.6%¡À7.6%, respectively (Figure 2). Among the 69 patients with inter-risk of IPI (2−3), patients with PET-BMI(+) (N=21) had significantly inferior PFS and OS than patients with PET-BMI(−) (N=48) (P =0.009 and P<0.001, respectively) (Figure 3).ConclusionsOur data raised several important issues about the predictive significance of BMI assessed by PET-CT in DLBCL: (i) The bone marrow status assessed by PET-CT is an independent predictor of OS independent of IPI; (ii) For baseline PET-BMI(+) patients, the optimal cutoff value of SUVmax(BM) to predict the survival outcomes was 8.6; (iii) In patients with stage IV disease, worse survival outcomes were observed in patients with BMI than that without BMI; (iV) Patients with PET-BMI(+) in the intermediate risk-group should be managed as high-risk group patients.Table 1Cox regression analysis for PFS and OS for all the patients with DLBCL (N=169)PFSOSUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysisUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysisHR (95%CI)PHR (95%CI)PHR (95%CI)PHR (95%CI)PPET-BMI+3.96 (2.38-6.59)<0.001--6.73 (3.40-13.34)<0.0012.90 (1.21-6.96)0.017BMB-BMI+4.49 (2.53-7.98)<0.001--6.24 (3.06-12.73)<0.001--IPI>27.27 (4.19-12.63)<0.0013.12 (1.31-7.47)0.0109.02 (3.94-20.61)<0.0013.62 (1.01-13.03)0.049Age >601.61 (0.98-2.64)0.0601.18 (0.61-2.27)0.627Stage III or IV6.08 (2.77-13.36)<0.001--6.78 (2.08-22.12)0.002--ECOG 2-42.79 (1.65-4.71)<0.0011.97 (1.12-3.47)0.0193.39 (1.75-6.55)<0.001--LDH>ULN4.68 (2.82-7.78)<0.001--4.31 (1.96-9.48)<0.001--Extranodal site >13.15 (1.91-5.18)<0.001--3.04 (1.58-5.86)0.001-- [Display omitted] [Display omitted] [Display omitted] DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.