Abstract

Simple SummarySentinel lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor for patients with cutaneous melanoma, but occasionally it is not possible to identify the sentinel lymph node. Little is known in cutaneous melanoma literature about the phenomenon of non-identification of sentinel lymph node and its prognostic implications. In this study we observed that not identifying the sentinel lymph node involves a worse nodal disease-free survival, but not a worse melanoma-specific survival than a negative sentinel lymph node. Potentially, patients with non-identified SLN should receive a follow-up schedule like that of patients with positive SLN.Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is recognized as the most important prognostic factor for patients with cutaneous melanoma. However, sometimes it is not possible to identify SLN. The phenomenon of non-identification of SLN and its prognostic role have not been thoroughly evaluated in melanoma literature. The objective of this study was to identify which patient or tumor variables may be associated to non-identification of SLN and to evaluate the prognostic role of non-identification of SLN. Methods: Observational retrospective study of 834 cutaneous melanoma patients who underwent SLN biopsy at Instituto Valenciano de Oncología. Results: Forty-two patients (5%) presented non-identification of SLN. Patients with age at diagnosis of ≥ 64 years, obesity (BMI ≥ 30), and head and neck localization were at higher risk of non-identification of SLN. Non-identified SLN patients had worse nodal disease-free survival with respect to negative SLN patients, but not worse melanoma-specific survival. Conclusions: Our findings suggest a need to follow-up patients with non-identified SLN in the same way as patients with positive SLN.

Highlights

  • Sentinel lymph node (SLN) involvement is the most important prognostic factor in patients with cutaneous melanoma [1]

  • The phenomenon of non-identification (NI) of SLN occurs in 1–6% of SLN biopsies (SLNB), with a higher rate reported if the tumor drains to cervical or ectopic basins [3,4,5,6,7]

  • Of 2196 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma registered in the database, 834 underwent

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) involvement is the most important prognostic factor in patients with cutaneous melanoma [1]. NV of SLN is reported in 2–3% of all melanoma patients undergoing SLNB [8,9]. Many motivations, both biological and technical, can justify NV. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is recognized as the most important prognostic factor for patients with cutaneous melanoma. The phenomenon of non-identification of SLN and its prognostic role have not been thoroughly evaluated in melanoma literature. Patients with age at diagnosis of ≥ 64 years, obesity (BMI ≥ 30), and head and neck localization were at higher risk of non-identification of SLN

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call