Abstract

BackgroundPrognostic counseling in multiple sclerosis (MS) is difficult because of the high variability of disease progression. Simultaneously, patients and physicians are increasingly confronted with making treatment decisions at an early stage, which requires taking individual prognoses into account to strike a good balance between benefits and harms of treatments. It is therefore important to understand how patients and physicians estimate prognostic risk, and whether and how these estimates can be improved. An online analytical processing (OLAP) tool based on pooled data from placebo cohorts of clinical trials offers short-term prognostic estimates that can be used for individual risk counseling.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to clarify if personalized prognostic information as presented by the OLAP tool is considered useful and meaningful by patients. Furthermore, we used the OLAP tool to evaluate patients' and physicians' risk estimates. Within this evaluation process we assessed short-time prognostic risk estimates of patients with MS (final n = 110) and their physicians (n = 6) and compared them with the estimates of OLAP.ResultsPatients rated the OLAP tool as understandable and acceptable, but to be only of moderate interest. It turned out that patients, physicians, and the OLAP tool ranked patients similarly regarding their risk of disease progression. Both patients' and physicians' estimates correlated most strongly with those disease covariates that the OLAP tool's estimates also correlated with most strongly. Exposure to the OLAP tool did not change patients' risk estimates.ConclusionWhile the OLAP tool was rated understandable and acceptable, it was only of modest interest and did not change patients' prognostic estimates. The results suggest, however, that patients had some idea regarding their prognosis and which factors were most important in this regard. Future work with OLAP should assess long-term prognostic estimates and clarify its usefulness for patients and physicians facing treatment decisions.

Highlights

  • Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease that can present in many different ways

  • It turned out that patients, physicians, and the online analytical processing (OLAP) tool ranked patients regarding their risk of disease progression

  • The results suggest, that patients had some idea regarding their prognosis and which factors were most important in this regard

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease that can present in many different ways. Overall prognosis shows an average walking distance of 100 m after 20 years of disease [1]. Despite many efforts to develop prognostic algorithms, making prognoses remains difficult, especially in the very early disease stage. The large variability in disease progression is challenging, because patients and physicians are increasingly confronted with making treatment decisions at an early stage. Individual treatment decisions should ideally take individual prognoses into account to strike a good balance between benefits and harms of treatments. Prognostic counseling in multiple sclerosis (MS) is difficult because of the high variability of disease progression. Patients and physicians are increasingly confronted with making treatment decisions at an early stage, which requires taking individual prognoses into account to strike a good balance between benefits and harms of treatments. An online analytical processing (OLAP) tool based on pooled data from placebo cohorts of clinical trials offers short-term prognostic estimates that can be used for individual risk counseling

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call