Prognostic implications of systemic immune-inflammation index in myocardial infarction patients with and without diabetes: insights from the NOAFCAMI-SH registry.

Abstract

It is well-known that systemic inflammation plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII, platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) is a novel index that is used for the characterization of the severity of systemic inflammation. Recent studies have identified the high SII level as an independent predictor of poor outcomes in patients with AMI. We aimed to investigate the prognostic implications of SII in AMI patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). We included 2111 patients with AMI from February 2014 to March 2018. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all-cause death and cardiovascular (CV) death. Multiple imputation was used for missing covariates. Of 2111 patients (mean age: 65.2 ± 12.2years, 77.5% were males) analyzed, 789 (37.4%) had DM. Generalized additive model analyses showed that as the SII increased, the C-reactive protein and peak TnT elevated while the LVEF declined, and these associations were similar in patients with and without DM. During a median of 2.5years of follow-up, 210 all-cause deaths and 154 CV deaths occurred. When treating the SII as a continuous variable, a higher log-transformed SII was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR: 1.57, 95%CI: 1.02-2.43) and CV mortality (HR: 1.85, 95%CI 1.12-3.05), and such an association was also significant in the diabetics (HRs and 95%CIs for all-cause death and CV death were 2.90 [1.40-6.01] and 3.28 [1.43-7.57], respectively) while not significant in the nondiabetics (Pinteraction for all-cause death and CV death were 0.019 and 0.049, respectively). Additionally, compared to patients with the lowest tertiles of SII, those with the highest tertiles of SII possessed significantly higher all-cause mortality (HR: 1.82, 95%CI 1.19-2.79) and CV mortality (HR: 1.82, 95%CI 1.19-2.79) after multivariable adjustment, and this relationship remained pronounced in the diabetics (HRs and 95%CIs for all-cause death and CV death were 2.00 [1.13-3.55] and 2.09 [1.10-3.98], respectively) but was not observed in the nondiabetics (HRs and 95%CIs for all-cause death and CV death were 1.21 [0.75-1.97] and 1.60 [0.89-2.90], respectively). Our restricted cubic splines analyses indicated a pronounced linear association between SII and mortality only in diabetics. In AMI patients with DM, high SII is an independent predictor of poor survival and may be helpful for patient's risk stratification.