Prognostic implications of right ventricular systolic and diastolic strain in heart failure

Abstract

Abstract Background 2D- speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) has recently be used to assess subclinical myocardial dysfunction, however its utility in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has been specifically focusing on the longitudinal systolic function of the left ventricle (LV). Aim To assess the prognostic relation between right ventricular (RV) systolic and diastolic strain parameters with clinical outcome in patients with advanced heart failure (HFrEF). Methods and results Of the initial 2217 HFrEF patients screened for this study only 562 consecutive patients with HFrEF were eligible and retrospectively enrolled, and 2D-STE strain parameters assessed on the 2D-TTE images. All patients were prospectively followed for development of new outcome/cardiac events which included hospitalization for acute HF, CVS-related death, heart transplantation, or need for ventricular assist device implantation. Conventional TTE was performed in all subjects and reviewed. RV longitudinal strain parameters (RVLS, RVLD) by 2D-STE were assessed and averaged in all segments (apical 4CV, global RVLS and RVLD) and also averaged free-wall. Of the 562 patients at baseline, 263 had 117 new events during a mean follow-up of 1.4 ± 0.7 years. RV free wall and global RV systolic and diastolic strain parameters, elevated NT Pro-BNP, RV fractional area change, low TAPSE, LV end-diastolic volume and the presence of at least moderate TR, and PASP > 40mmHg were independently predictive of combined outcomes ( p <.001). Overall, the best performance parameters predictive of cardiovascular events were for RV Free Wall systolic and diastolic strain (AUC: 0.84 and 74), global RV systolic and diastolic strain (AUC: 0.77 and 70) and RV fractional area change (AUC: 0.67). The strongest association between the degree of RV dysfunction and the risk of cardiovascular events was only evident for RV strain (free wall > global strain). Conclusion Patients with HFrEF, RV strain parameters are stronger predictors of outcome than other conventional parameters and should be included for regular clinical screening as these parameters provide a stronger prognostic stratification.