Abstract

Conservation breast treatment is of particular interest to young women, but whether saving the breast carries a penalty in shorter survival or local-regional recurrent disease has not been well-established. At The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute at Houston, 1161 patients treated prior to 1983 with Stage I or II breast cancer were reviewed. Of these patients, 378 were treated with tumorectomy plus irradiation, and 783 were treated with radical or modified radical mastectomy. The two patient groups were compared relative to local-regional disease recurrence and overall and disease-free survivals. Local recurrences in the breast appear to be more frequent in patients ≤35 years of age treated with tumorectomy and irradiation than in patients older than 35 years, but in patients aged ≤50 or >50 or ≤35 or >35 years, there was no significant statistical difference between tumorectomy and irradiation or mastectomy nor was there a difference in disease-free survival. Overall survival rates favored patients treated by tumorectomy and irradiation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.