Abstract

BackgroundAfter an acute myocardial infarction (MI), repeated measurement of cardiac biomarkers is commonly performed, although not recommended in current guidelines. There is only limited data on the kinetics of troponin in this phase. For high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), but not high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI), late increases in terms of a second peak have been described. Their impact on the prognosis of patients with MI remains unclear.MethodsWe included 2,305 patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of MI. Five hundred and seven were diagnosed with MI. Hs-cTnT, creatine kinase (CK) and the MB fraction of CK (CK-MB) were measured at admission, after 1 and 3 h and thereafter as indicated by the treating physician. A mixed-model approach was applied for modeling the biomarker kinetics. All patients were followed up to assess a composite endpoint of mortality, recurrent MI, revascularization and rehospitalization and to investigate the effect of a second hs-cTnT peak on prognosis.ResultsOut of 507 patients with MI, 192 had a sufficient amount of hs-cTnT measurements after the index MI. In 111 (57.8%) patients a second hs-cTnT peak was found after 4.48 days. For CK and CK-MB a second peak could not be identified. Regarding the composite endpoint there was no significant difference between patients with and without a second hs-cTnT peak.ConclusionIn our analyses, a second peak of hs-cTnT after an acute MI was common, but not associated with poorer outcome. Thus, the clinical value of hs-cTnT for monitoring myocardial ischemia might be limited in this phase and other biomarkers might be more suitable.Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02355457, Date of registration: February 4, 2015.

Highlights

  • High sensitivity cardiac troponin has evolved as being the gold-standard biomarker for diagnosing myocardial injury and infarction (MI) [1, 2]

  • There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between patients with and without a second high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) peak (Table 1)

  • Regarding the composite endpoint there was no significant difference between patients with and without a second hs-cTnT peak for both unadjusted analyses [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58–1.48, p = 0.75] and after adjustment for sex, age and cardiovascular risk factors (HR 0.78, CI 0.48–1.28, p = 0.33) (Figure 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

High sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) has evolved as being the gold-standard biomarker for diagnosing myocardial injury and infarction (MI) [1, 2]. Even though not recommended in current guidelines, repeated measurement of hs-cTn is commonly performed in clinical practice in the first days after MI. There is only limited data on the kinetics of hs-cTn after an acute MI and Second Hs-cTnT Peak After MI their consecutive clinical and prognostic implications. After an acute myocardial infarction (MI), repeated measurement of cardiac biomarkers is commonly performed, not recommended in current guidelines. For high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), but not high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI), late increases in terms of a second peak have been described. Their impact on the prognosis of patients with MI remains unclear

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call