Abstract
A subset of clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCCs) exhibits various growth patterns that infiltrate the normal renal parenchyma; however, our understanding of its association with cancer aggressiveness is incomplete. Here, we show that the morphology of the tumor interface with normal renal parenchyma is robustly associated with cancer recurrence after surgery, even when compared with the TNM staging system or the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) nuclear grade in nonmetastatic ccRCC. Hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides of whole tissue sections from surgical specimens were analyzed using a cohort of 331 patients with nonmetastatic ccRCC treated with radical nephrectomy. The patients were classified into 10 subgroups based on our classification algorithms for assessing the tumor interface with normal renal parenchyma. Among the 10 subgroups, 4 subgroups consisting of 40 patients (12%) were identified to have aggressive forms of nonmetastatic ccRCC associated with poor prognosis and unified as renal parenchymal infiltration or micronodular spread (RPI/MNS) phenotypes. Multivariable analyses showed that RPI/MNS phenotypes were robustly associated with shorter disease-free survival, independently of existing pathological factors including the TNM staging system and WHO/ISUP nuclear grade. The hazard ratio was highest for RPI/MNS (4.62), followed by WHO/ISUP grades 3 to 4 (2.11) and ≥pT3a stage (2.05). In addition, we conducted genomic analyses using next-generation sequencing of infiltrative lesions in 18 patients with RPI/MNS and tumor lesions in 33 patients without RPI/MNS. Results showed that alterations in SETD2 and TSC1 might be associated with RPI/MNS phenotypes, whereas alterations in PBRM1 might be associated with non-RPI/MNS phenotypes. These data suggest that RPI/MNS may be associated with aggressive genomic backgrounds of ccRCC, although more comprehensive analyses with a larger sample size are required. Future studies may further elucidate the clinical implications of RPI/MNS, particularly for deciding the indication of adjuvant treatment after nephrectomy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.