Prognostic Factors of Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with t(8;21) (q22;q22): A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to analyze the treatment effect and prognostic factors of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with t(8;21). A total of 268 newly diagnosed pediatric AML (pAML) enrolled from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed, and 50 (18.7%) patients harbored t(8;21) translocation. CR rate, OS, EFS, and RFS were assessed by multivariate Logistic and Cox regression models in these patients. Of the 50 patients, 2 patients abandoned treatment during the first induction course. Of the remaining 48 patients who received double-induction therapy and were included in the final analyses, CR1 and CR2 were 75.0% (36/48) and 95.8% (46/48), respectively. The overall three-year OS, EFS, and RFS were 68.4% (95% CI, 55.0-85.1), 64.2% (95% CI, 50.7-81.4), and 65.5% (95% CI, 51.9-82.8), respectively. The presence of loss of sex chromosome (LOS) at diagnosis (n = 21) was associated with a better 3-year OS [87.5% (95% CI, 72.7-100) vs. 52.7% (95% CI, 35.1-79.3), p = 0.0089], 3-year EFS [81.6% (95% CI, 64.7-100) vs. 49.7% (95% CI, 32.4-76.4), p = 0.023], and 3-year RFS [81.6% (95% CI, 64.7-100) vs. 51.7% (95% CI, 33.9-78.9), p = 0.036] than those without LOS (n = 27), and it was also an independent good prognostic factor of OS (HR, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.01-0.48], p = 0.005), EFS (HR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.05-0.85], p = 0.029), and RFS (HR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.05-0.90], p = 0.035). However, extramedullary leukemia (EML) featured the independent risk factors of inferior OS (HR, 10.99 [95% CI, 2.08-58.12], p = 0.005), EFS (HR, 4.75 [95% CI, 1.10-20.61], p = 0.037), and RFS (HR, 6.55 [95% CI, 1.40-30.63], p = 0.017) in pediatric individuals with t(8;21) AML. Further analysis of combining LOS with EML indicated that the EML+LOS- subgroup had significantly inferior OS (92.9%, [95% CI, 80.3-100]), EFS (86.2%, [95% CI, 70.0-100]), and RFS (86.2%, [95% CI, 80.3-100]) compared to the other three subgroups (all p < 0.001). LOS and EML are independent prognostic factors of OS, EFS, and RFS with t(8;21) pAML patients. LOS combined with EML may help improve risk stratification.