Abstract

Background: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a distinctive subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) characterized by translocation between chromosome 15 and 17, t(15;17). Addition of all-transretinoic acid (ATRA), which can induce differentiation of leukemic blasts and promyelocyte, to anthracycline-based chemotherapy brought novel concept and made major advance in treatment for APL. Although APL patients show the highest survival rate among AML patients, some fraction of patients eventually relapsed. However, prognostic factors have been unclearly defined than those in other subtypes of AML in which cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities have been emphasized. In this study, we evaluated prognostic factors in APL patients receiving ATRA-based treatments.Patients and Methods: A total of 77 patients who newly diagnosed with APL treated at Severance Hospital from 2005 to 2014 were enrolled, and clinical data was retrospectively reviewed. All patients had treated with modified PETHEMA protocol consisting with ATRA and anthracycline-based regimen.Results: Except 9 patients who refused the treatment or did not complete the first cycle of chemotherapy due to treatment-related mortalities, 68 patients completed at least one cycle of chemotherapy and all achieved molecular complete remission (CR). During the treatment or follow-up period, eleven (16.2%) of 68 patients experienced relapse, and median duration of the first CR of these 11 patients was 38.8 months (range 28.0 ~ 88.0 months). Clinical and laboratory parameters analyzed were listed in Table 1. Severe bleeding episodes were more correlated with initial abnormal coagulation profiles than initial platelet counts. Interestingly, delayed achievement of molecular CR was not significant risk factor for relapse. Univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) showed that older age more than 60 year-old (p=0.045), higher initial WBC counts (p=0.035), abnormal coagulation profiles (P<0.0001), initial presence of documented fever or infection (p=0.002), and higher Charlson comorbidity index (p=0.008) were significant poor prognostic factors. For disease-free survival (DFS), initial presence of documented fever or infection (p=0.007), and higher Charlson comorbidity index (p<0.0001) were significant poor prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis for OS, higher initial WBC counts (p=0.05), abnormal coagulation profiles (p=0.005), and higher Charlson comorbidity index (p<0.0001) were independent poor prognostic factors, and for DFS, initial presence of documented fever or infection (p=0.025) was single independent poor prognostic factor.Conclusion: Because APL is already belong to cytogenetically very good or good risk group and treated by chemotherapy containing differentiating agents such as ATRA, predicting prognosis must be distinguished from that in AML. In this study, initial WBC counts, coagulation profiles, and comorbidity are independent prognostic factors for OS, and initial fever or infection is for DFS. For the next step, to figure out how initial systemic inflammation related to fever or infection influence the differentiation or apoptosis of leukemic myeloid cells by treatment will expand our understanding of APL.Table 1[Clinical and laboratory characteristics of APL patients]CharacteristicsTotalNo. of patients77Age, median (range), years44.8(17-81)≤60/>6064/13Gender, M/F42/35Charlson comorbidity index, median (range)2.54(0-10)WBC x 10^9/L, median (range)16.17(0.39-208.65)≤10/>10/NA54/21/2PLT x 10^9/L, median (range)35(7-155)≤4/>4/NA51/24/2Hb, g/L, median (range)8.82(3.4-14.8)Lymphocyte, %, median (range)31.8(1-84)LDH, IU/L, median (range)537(40-3418)Ferritin, ng/mL, median (range)832(15.8-4567.6)PT/aPTT, sec, median (range)14.6(9.8-23.8)/29.0(20.4-39.8)Albumin, g/dL, median (range)4.0(2.3-5.9)Sanz risk categoryLow/Intermediate/High14/40/21Initial fever or infection, n (%)12(15.6%)Abnormal coagulation profilePT prolongation only, n (%)14(18.7%)Low ATIII level only, n (%)10(13.3%)Both PT prolongation and low ATIII level, n (%)4(5.4%)NA, n (%)2(2.7%)Additional Chromosome aberration, n (%)12(15.6%)Outcome of induction, n (%)Hematologic CR/NA68/9F/U period (months), median (range)35.8(0.1-98.4)Timing of mCR achievement, n (%)After 1st/2nd/3rd/4th CTx32/29/6/1 DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.